The Israeli government began implementation of the Prawer-Begin plan, officially known as the Bill on the Arrangement of Bedouin Settlement in the Negev.  Bedouins are an indigenous people who live a nomadic life in the Negev Desert which is part of the state of Israel.   The Negev does not involve any of the Occupied Territories.  The plan seeks to move about 200,000 Bedouins into government approved villages out of the approximately 35 villages in which they currently live.  The Israeli government argues that the current living conditions of the Bedouin are unsafe and it wishes to place them in villages that can offer better circumstances. The Bedouin, who are Israeli citizens, argue that their land is being expropriated and that their way of life is threatened.  The Israeli government intends to settle Jewish families in the region.

The Negev Desert

Protests have broken out in Ukraine against President Viktor Yanukovich’s decision not to build stronger ties with the European Union.  The authorities responded with force to the protests and many people were injured.  The protests reflect a long-term discontent with the policies of Yanukovich and the division within Ukraine of those who wish to have closer ties with Russia and those who wish to move closer to the EU.

The 7th day of protests in Thailand saw gunshots and a large number of injured Thais.  The protests seek the ouster of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, the sister of the exiled former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.  The military has been mobilized, but it seems reluctant to intervene.  With the prospect of greater violence, the hand of the military may be forced.

China scrambled fighter jets into its Air Defense Identification Zone as US and Japanese fighters continue to probe into the Zone without filing flight plans or radio frequencies.  Both sides are testing each other’s intentions and the situation is certainly delicate.  No one is looking for a shooting war but this is a classic test of wills.  The burden is on China since it unilaterally declared the Zone so the probes are designed to find out how serious China is on insisting on its air control.  Chinese leaders really have more important interests to protect, but it is difficult to tell whether the Chinese military is the driver of this confrontation.

The P5+1/Iran six-month agreement is itself highly significant, but there have been a host of ancillary moves by other countries eager to take advantage of the thaw in relations.  India has rushed a special team to Iran to speed up the building of a port in southern Iran that would serve as a conduit for closer economic relations between India, Iran, and Afghanistan.  The project has been on the books for a number of years, but India did not push it for fear of offending the US who was leading the sanctions against Iran.  The port is designed to skirt Pakistani territory, but it also has the effect of challenging the Pakistani port of Gwadar which has been boosted by China as an economic center.  Turkey also moved quickly to restore trade with Iran.  All of these moves have the effect of validating the nuclear agreement and making it more difficult to unravel.  They also have the effect of increasing Israel’s costs if it were to take unilateral action against Iran.

Protests have been ongoing in Thailand for over three months, and have recently increased in both size and intensity.  The controversy is over an amnesty bill that would allow a former Prime Minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, to return to Thailand after a three year exile abroad.  Mr Shinawatra was accused of several crimes and was ousted from office by the Thai military, but he remains a polarizing figure.  The split in Thailand is multi-faceted, but the rural vs. urban is quite evident in this dispute.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!!!!

Angela Merkel has reached a possible agreement on a new coalition government five weeks after the German gave her Christian Democratic Party a strong, but not majority, vote.  The proposed coalition includes the Christian Democrats, the Christian Social Union, and the Social Democrats.  The agreement needs the approval of the Social Democrat membership before it can go into effect.  The deal that brought the parties together includes an increase in the minimum wage in Germany, revisions to pension rules, and an expansion of the laws requiring renewable energy.  The wage increase was the most difficult pill for the Christian Democrats who generally dislike government interventions in the market.  It also rhetorically undermines the German position in the European Union which favors austerity approaches to market management.

James Fallows is  an exceptionally astute defense analyst who write for the Atlantic.  He posted an article on the Chinese Air Defense Identification Zone which has aroused so much controversy.  He does an excellent job of explaining some of the intricacies of the Zone (which I did not know before) as well as some interesting interpretations of why the Chinese decided to make the unilateral announcement of the Zone.   The US has come out with a categorical statement affirming the Japanese claim to the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands.  Not a surprise at all, but the Chinese cannot be pleased.

The P5+1 agreement with Iran signals a rather dramatic shift in world politics.  If the temporary agreement does lead to a permanent agreement in 6 months, the tectonic plates of the Middle East will change all previous alliances in the region.  The one country that seems to be left out in the cold in this shift is Israel; Saudi Arabia does have other allies in the region.  There is pressure building within Israel for at least a major change in tone toward the US and the other permanent members of the UN Security Council.

In what can only be described as a provocative act, the US has flown aircraft through the maritime zone earlier claimed by China without registering a flight plan or registering the frequencies of the aircraft.  In short, the US flew through the territory as if it were genuinely international (as most of the world currently regards it).  To make matters worse, according to the Reuters report, the Pentagon spokesperson referred to the islands as the Senkakus, and not the Diaoyu as they are called by the Chinese.  This is a photograph of what the Chinese and Japanese are sparring over (and which might be the occasion for war).

Many media outlets, most of them non-US outlets, are commenting on the document released by the Vatican today.  It is an “Apostolic Exhortation” written by Pope Francis.  The media have focused on a certain part of the document which severely criticizes certain aspects of market capitalism.  I was intrigued by these excerpts, not for their religious significance, but rather for how the words resonate with many of the protests that we have witnessed in the world in recent years (Bulgaria, Greece, the Occupy Movement, and many of the protests associated with what is termed the “Arab Spring”).  The language of section 54 is particularly pertinent to the roots of these political protests:

“In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting. To sustain a lifestyle which excludes others, or to sustain enthusiasm for that selfish ideal, a globalization of indifference has developed. Almost without being aware of it, we end up being incapable of feeling compassion at the outcry of the poor, weeping for other people’s pain, and feeling a need to help them, as though all this were someone else’s responsibility and not our own. The culture of prosperity deadens us; we are thrilled if the market offers us something new to purchase; and in the meantime all those lives stunted for lack of opportunity seem a mere spectacle; they fail to move us.”

The fourth Sahel Festival is taking place in the village of Lompoul in the north of Senegal.  The Festival is notable this year because it is taking place in the midst of extraordinary turmoil in the region.  Music triumphs over everything!  Here is a video from last year’s festival:

Sadly, the US uses the prison system to a far greater extent than most other industrialized countries.  It currently has a record number of incarcerated people, and over half of those people are in jail for drug-related offenses.  In fact, if being an inmate were considered a profession, it would be one of the most popular professions in the US.  The following graph is a terrible commentary on how the US cultivates its human resources.

Some people have begun to refer our current geologic age as the “Anthropocene” as a way to underline the pre-eminent influence human beings have on “background” processes (meaning how the world would develop if there were no human beings on the planet).  The most obvious manifestation of the effects of human activity is, of course, climate change.  But by the end of this century, there will be about 11 billion people living on the planet.  The effect on animal habitats will likely be devastating without some major behavioral changes.

The Swiss turned down the referendum that sought to limit the compensation of executives to no more than 12 times that of the lowest paid worker in any given firm.  The defeat was expected, but supporters of the measure took comfort in having raised an important issue not only in Switzerland but all over the world.

The P5+1 and Iran have announced that they have reached an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program.  Remember that this agreement is merely an interim agreement, designed to be in effect for only for 6 months while a longer, more permanent agreement is pursued.  The White House has issued a fact sheet on what the agreement entails.

What did the Iranians give up?  According to the Financial Times:

“Iran will “neutralise” its stockpile of 20 per cent uranium by diluting below 5 per cent or converting to a form not suitable for further enrichment; halt progress on its enrichment capacity; and leave inoperable about half of installed centrifuges at Natanz and three-quarters of centrifuges at Fordow.

“Iran will also commit to freeze activities at its Arak heavy-water facility which is under construction and, if operable, could produce plutonium for a nuclear weapon. Iran would also not construct a facility capable of reprocessing plutonium from spent fuel.”

Iran has also agreed to what the agreement calls “enhanced monitoring” which translates into daily inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency.  The two enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow are already subject to the most intrusive inspections ever maintained by the IAEA: weekly, unannounced inspections.

What did Iran gain?  Certain of the sanctions against Iran will be lifted–according to the US about $7 billion out of a total of $100 billion worth of sanctions.  The curb on the export of Iranian oil will not be lifted (so do not look for gasoline prices to go down quickly).  And Iran will be able to enrich uranium to 5%, although it cannot increase its supplies of 5% enriched uranium during the six months.  The latter point is significant.  Although the NPT explicitly recognizes the right of every signatory nation to run a peaceful nuclear program, the UN Security Council in its previous three resolutions on Iran has demanded that Iran had to “suspend” its enrichment activities.  So even though the US and the other members of the Security Council had argued that Iran had no “right” to enrich uranium (a case presumably based on some sense of the illegitimate intentions of the Iranian state), the agreement implicitly recognizes that Iran has a right to enrich uranium.

What are the reactions from other states to the agreement?  One should be careful here:  initial comments are almost purely rhetorical since no one has had a chance to really study the agreement.  We will follow up on this issue as more careful reactions emerge.  Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu called the agreement a “historic mistake.”  Last Friday, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the UK, Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz, said “We are not going to sit idly by and receive a threat there and not think seriously how we can best defend our country and our region.”  When asked what his country’s options were, he replied: “…all options are available.”  Finally, there are many in Congress who opposed any deal that recognized the right of Iran to enrich uranium.

My own view is that this agreement is a very good first step and should be firmly supported.  I have no reassurances to offer to those who oppose the deal because it offers no “certainty” that Iran will not develop the capability to develop a nuclear weapon.  But the absence of an agreement offers no certainty whatsoever of that outcome.  Indeed, without any agreement, Iran has developed a serious capability even in the face of the toughest sanctions the UN has ever applied to any state.  The only course of action that holds out any possibility of a permanently disarmed Iran is an armed attack upon Iranian nuclear facilities, and there are considerable doubts about whether that option is at all viable or desirable. President Rouhani has sent many signals that he is serious about reintegrating Iran into the global economy and there are countless reasons to believe that that objective is a compelling one to him and all of the Iranian people.  I genuinely hope that the agreement succeeds.

There is an interesting op-ed essay in the New York Times that follows up on the article we read earlier about the Swiss referendum that would limit the highest  paid employees to salaries no more than 12 times that of the lowest paid employees.  The essay was written by a Swiss resident and it explains some of the cultural background to the issue.  The election is to be held on Sunday, and polls indicate that it will likely fail.  We shall see.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China has announced an “Air Defense Zone” that includes the contested Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands (in the lower part of the zone identified in the map).

The Chinese also issued a statement “saying all aircraft must notify Chinese authorities and are subject to emergency military measures if they do not identify themselves or obey orders from Beijing. It said it would ‘identify, monitor, control and react’ to any air threats or unidentified flying objects coming from the sea.”  The Japanese have lodged a “serious protest” over the unilateral claim, but it is unclear whether the Japanese will try to test the Chinese claim.

US Secretary of State Kerry has once again gone to Geneva for the P5+1/Iran talks.  And, once again, there is a great sense of anticipation of a possible negotiated deal.  Whether that feeling is justified will be clear in a few days,  but the foreign policy heavy weights of the P5 are deeply involved, suggesting that there is a strong sense that an agreement is possible.  We are beginning to get a better idea of the issues that are still under dispute.  One of those issues is whether Iran will delay the start-up of its new reactor at Arak.  Since that reactor will produce plutonium, the issue is of great significance.  But since this negotiation is only on a temporary, not a permanent, agreement, it seems that the Iranians could easily agree to stop working on the reactor for 6 months.  The other major issue is a curious one: whether the Iranians should stop enriching uranium.  Since the right to enrich uranium is codified in the Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Iran is a signatory, that dispute seems nonsensical.  Article Four of the NPT reads as follows:

“Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.”

But the Israelis and the Americans (and apparently the French, although they have said so explicitly) believe that uranium enrichment is not covered by Article Four even though it is impossible to run a peaceful nuclear reactor without enriched uranium.  This dispute, however, also seems to be something that can be verbally resolved, at least for 6 months.  Whether it can be resolved in a permanent agreement is more difficult to answer.

One of the deepest concerns about the very slow economic recovery of the 2007-08 recession (The Great Recession) is the persistence of youth unemployment.  Unemployed young people not only contribute to slow economic growth now, but their late start in the job market often reduces possible growth in the future.  The global rates on youth unemployment are staggering.

Source: Sam Ro,  “Youth Unemployment Rates Are Terrible Everywhere,” Business Insider, 22 November 2013

(http://www.businessinsider.com/total-vs-youth-unemployment-rates-2013-11?nr_email_referer=1&utm_source=Triggermail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Markets%20Chart%20Of%20The%20Day&utm_campaign=Moneygame_COTD_112213)

A study by Richard Heede which was published in the journal Climatic Change argues that 90 corporations are responsible for about 60% of all the carbon dioxide emissions on the planet.  The study was presented to the UN Conference on Climate Change in Warsaw and has not yet been vetted by a large number of climate scientists.  Moreover, the study suggests that half of all the carbon dioxide emissions from industrial activity has occurred in the last twenty-five years.  The latter statistic, if valid, would suggest that the dangers of greenhouse gas emission are accelerating more rapidly than previously thought.  The list of companies was described by the Guardian in this manner:

“The list of 90 companies included 50 investor-owned firms – mainly oil companies with widely recognised names such as Chevron, Exxon, BP , and Royal Dutch Shell and coal producers such as British Coal Corp, Peabody Energy and BHP Billiton.

Some 31 of the companies that made the list were state-owned companies such as Saudi Arabia’s Saudi Aramco, Russia’s Gazprom and Norway’s Statoil.

Nine were government run industries, producing mainly coal in countries such as China, the former Soviet Union, North Korea and Poland, the host of this week’s talks.”

If the list is accurate, then it frames an action plan to stop greenhouse gas emissions radically different than the country-by-country model traditionally used.

Ukraine has decided to developed closer economic relations with Russia rather than to embrace the Eastern Partnership program initiated by the European Union in 2009.  Both Russia and the EU have been cultivating ties with Ukraine for a number of years, and the decision is a clear victory for Russia and Vladimir Putin.  Russia has always regarded Ukraine as a central component of a greater Russia, and a turn to the West would have damaged not only Putin’s economic plans but also the larger sense of nationalism being cultivated in Russia right now.  Whether the turn to the East was a wise choice remains to be seen.  Ukraine is a heavily indebted country which needs considerable economic assistance to revive its economy.

As we have finished our class discussions on the problems of nuclear proliferation, it seems appropriate to appreciate the significance of nuclear weapons to the conduct of world politics.   Between 1945 and 1998 there have been 2053 nuclear explosions on the planet.  Japanese artist Isao Hashimoto visually represents these explosions in a stunningly scary video:

Several hundred people walked out of the UN Climate Conference meeting in Warsaw, Poland.  It is not clear from the reports I have read whether those that walked out were delegates or observers of the climate conference. There is little question, however, that the level of frustration at this meeting is exceptionally high.  Several countries have publicly admitted that they have missed their emission targets for greenhouse gases and the discussion on compensation demanded by the poorer countries has received virtually no official attention.  The lack of progress in the round of negotiations is palpable.

And yet another threat to worry about.